The lengthy legal battle between Ripple
The lengthy legal battle between Ripple 
$ 2 and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reached another critical phase on May 8, 2025. Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York dismissed the parties’ request to lower a $125 million fine to $50 million and to release blocked funds, citing it as “procedurally improper.” Though this decision closes the door to a possible settlement, it does not reverse the 2023 ruling that found XRP is not a security on exchanges. Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, assured stakeholders, “The rights we have won remain valid.”
Continued Uncertainty in the Ripple Lawsuit
The latest court decision has thrown Ripple and the SEC’s two-year negotiation process back into a deadlock. Ripple aimed to move forward confidently by reducing the fine, but the SEC wanted to ensure the company was held accountable. Judge Torres’ remark on “procedural impropriety” suggests the parties were attempting to stretch procedural boundaries. This development feeds the uncertainty over XRP’s future despite the historic 2023 decision, sparking short-term market fluctuations.
Analyst SMQKE, focusing on the theoretical aspects, recalled an article in William & Mary Law Review, suggesting that XRP investors might share in Ripple’s future cash flows. Such a scenario could align XRP closely with Ripple’s profits, potentially categorizing it as a security. Nevertheless, Judge Torres’ 2023 decision emphasizing that publicly sold XRP is not an investment contract is still applicable. Therefore, XRP’s status is once again up for courtroom evaluation.
If the Case Concludes in Ripple’s Favor…
A favorable outcome for Ripple could establish a disruptive reference model for traditional financial entities. Banks and asset management companies have been interested in adopting Blockchain for critical processes, from payments to custodial duties, but were hindered by securities laws. Official recognition of XRP as “not a security” would open avenues for companies to streamline both capital-raising and value transfer processes within the Blockchain, providing faster and more cost-effective transactions.
The groundwork would be laid for the immediate exchange of tokenized stocks, custodian services via smart contracts, and payment systems directly connected to wallets. While institutions maintain their intermediary roles, they will also digitize their infrastructures. Judicial endorsement of the Ripple model would signal that “Blockchain is no longer a side project but the main framework,” potentially advancing the sector to a maturity phase. Conversely, an unfavorable verdict would underscore the persistent fragility in the technology-law balance and could delay similar projects.